Influences of La and Ce doping on giant magnetocaloric effect of EuTiO
Mo Zhao-Jun1, †, Sun Qi-Lei2, Shen Jun3, Yang Mo2, Li Yu-Jin2, Li Lan1, Liu Guo-Dong2, Tang Cheng-Chun2, Meng Fan-Bin2
School of Material Science and Engineering, Institute of Material Physics, Key Laboratory of Display Materials and Photoelectric Devices of Ministry of Education of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Optoelectronic Materials and Devices of Tianjin, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300191, China
School of Material Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: mozhaojun@iphy.ac.cn

Abstract

Giant reversible magnetocaloric effects and magnetic properties in Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) are investigated. The antiferromagnetic ordering of pure EuTiO3 can significantly change to be ferromagnetic as substitution of La (x = 0.1) and Ce (x = 0.1) ions for Eu2+ ions. The values of and RC are evaluated to be 10.8 J/(kgK) and 51.8 J/kg for Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 and 11 J/(kgK) and 39.3 J/kg for Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 at a magnetic field change of 10 kOe, respectively. The large low-field enhancements of and RC can be attributed to magnetic phase transition. The giant reversible MCE and large RC suggest that Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) compounds could be promising materials in low temperature and low magnetic field refrigerants.

1. Introduction

Compared with the traditional gas compression/expansion refrigeration technology, the magnetic refrigeration (MR) technology based on the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) possesses advantages, such as high efficiency and energy saving, being green, stable, and reliable. The basic mechanism of the MCE is magneto-thermodynamic phenomenon of a magnetic material, which is evaluated from the isothermal magnetic entropy change ( and the adiabatic temperature change ( in a changing magnetic field.[1] The researches of magnetic refrigeration materials mainly concentrate in the areas of room temperature and low temperature, such as LaCaMnO3,[2] Gd5Si2Ge2,[3] MnFeX (X = P, As, Si, Ge),[4] and Ni–Mn–Ga,[5,6] RCo2,[7,8] RNi2 (R = Gd, Dy, Ho, Er),[911] RCoAl (R = Tb, Dy, Ho),[12,13] etc.

The low-temperature magnetocaloric materials are very important in the field of hydrogen liquefaction and air science. In the past few years, the rare earth intermetallic compounds have become a main research subject. Recently, in the rare earth oxides, the intermetallic oxide has become a new research hotspot such as DyMnO3,[14] Gd2NiMnO6,[15] HoMn2O5,[16] etc. The perovskite oxide RMO3 (R = rare earth; M = transition metal) system has a strong coupling between spin, lattice, orbital and charge degrees of freedom. It shows unique optical, electrical, magnetic and excellent magnetoresistance effect, catalytic performance, and magnetocaloric effect.

The EuTiO3 exhibits G-type AFM order, and the modulated magnetic ground state with antiferromagnetic (AFM) and ferromagnetic (FM) phase co-existence has been reported in EuTiO3, based on the first-principles calculation.[17,18] There are two corresponding mechanisms here. One is the super-exchange mechanism that leads to antiferromagnetic (AFM) exchange, and the other is the indirect exchange mechanism that leads to ferromagnetic (FM) exchange. What is more, the EuTiO3 has strong spin lattice coupling. The competition between AFM and FM phases is a delicate balance, so the magnetic state can be easily switched from AFM to FM, such as a increasing with the lattice constant relaxed or c increasing, with a fixed.[19] The EuTiO3 has taken the center stage of research due to the observations of the giant magnetocaloric (GMC) and giant magneto-electric (GME) effects around its AFM ordering temperature of Eu spins ( K).[2024] It has been shown that a small number of (Ba and Sr) substituteions at the Eu site or (Cr and Nb) substitution at the Ti site drive the system into an FM metallic state. Rubi reported the magnetoelectric effect in Eu1−xBaxTiO3 for .[20] Mo et al. reported the giant magnetocaloric effects in Eu1−xSrxTiO3 and EuTi1−xCrxO3.[21,22] Roy et al. reported the in magnetoelectric EuTi0.85Nb0.15O3 compound.[23]

In the present paper, we show the great enhancements of both and RC upon applying moderate field changes (1 T) to Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) compounds with respect to EuTiO3. The values of and RC are calculated to be 10.8 J/kgK and 51.8 J/kg for Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 and 11 J/kg Kand 39.3 J/kg for Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 at magnetic field change of 10 kOe, respectively The reversible giant low-field MCE and RC make them an excellent candidate for the applications in a cooling device

2. Experiments

The Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) samples were prepared by the sol-gel method. Stoichiometric mixtures of europium oxide (Eu2O3), butyl phthalate (Ti(OCH and ceria (CeO2) or lanthanum oxide (La2O3), were dissolved in 25 mL of nitric acid (HNO3 8 mol/L). Then ethylene glycol (C2H6O2) was added as a dispersant, and stirred for an hour. Next, the solution was heated at 90 °C until a dry gel was obtained. Finally, the samples were pretreated at 900 °C for two hours in air to obtain Eu2Ti2O7 and (R = La, Ce), and these materials were annealed at 1100 °C in 10% H2 and 90% Ar atmosphere for 3 h.

The structures of the Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) were determined by x-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation. The magnetic properties of the samples were measured by physical property measurement system (PPMS).

3. Results and discussion

Figure 1(a) shows the XRD patterns of EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3(R = La, Ce) single crystal at 295 K. They crystallize into the cubic perovskite structure with Pm3m space group. The lattice parameters are determined respectively to be a = 3.908(2) Å for EuTiO3, a = 3.910(4) Å for Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 and a = 3.911(5) Å for Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 with and by the Rietveld technique using GSAS program shown in Table 1. In oxides, oxygen defects are almost inevitable, which approve to be intrinsic defects, and believed to have a critical influence on their properties.[25] The oxygen content in Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) samples is determined by the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The perovskite EuTiO3 is obtained by pyrochlore Eu2Ti2O7 under the hydrogen reduction reaction: the reduction of Eu3+ to Eu2+. Hence, the Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) can oxidize Eu2Ti2O7 and Ti2O7(R = La, Ce) through the following reaction:

The oxygen nonstoichiometric parameter δ of perovskite phase can be calculated from the weight gain of the sample during oxidation on heating in air from the following formula:

Fig. 1. (color online) (a) XRD patterns of the EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce). (b) Thermogravimetry (TGA) trace of Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 and Eu0.9La0.1TiO3.
Table 1.

Values of and RC under the field changes of 10 kOe and 20 kOe for EuTiO3, Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3, and Eu0.9La0.1TiO3.

.

Figure 1(b) shows the TGA results of the EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) samples, obtained by measuring the weight gain in a temperature range from room temperature to 700 K in air at a rate of 5 K/min. The δ values for EuTiO3, Eu0.9La0.1TiO3, and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 are calculated to be −0.006, 0.012, and 0.027, from the weight gain of , and , respectively. The negative sign suggests a slight vacancy of oxygen in EuTiO3 and the positive sign refers to a slight excess of oxygen in the Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce), so the compositions can be written as Eu0.9La0.1TiO3.012 and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3.027. The small oxygen excess may be caused by cationic deficiency at the Eu sites according to valence state compensation, but they are smaller than the theoretical values (Eu0.9La0.1TiO3.05 and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3.05). It indicates that there are oxygen defects in the Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce).

Figure 2(a) shows the zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) of the Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) compounds under an applied magnetic field of 0.1 kOe. The EuTiO3 exhibits a significant AFM order, and phase transition from AFM to PM at with no thermal hysteresis. However, the MT curves for Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 exhibit FM order and the ferromagnetic Curie temperature increases from and 5.5 K, respectively. They may be because the increase of the lattice constant leads to the magnetic transition from AFM to FM as Ce(x = 0.1) and La(x = 0.1) substitute for Eu. The microscopic origin of the strong spin-lattice coupling in EuTiO3 is derived from the superexchange mechanism between Eu2+ 4f spins via the 3d states of nonmagnetic Ti4+ ions along the a, b-plane diagonal, and the AFM phase also comes from a superexchange mechanism.[26,27] Therefore, the change of lattice constant affects the superexchange mechanism, thereby changing the magnetic state. The ZFC and FC curves for Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 exhibit completely reversible behaviors as observed usually in the second-order phase transition, but an obvious bifurcation appears below the transition temperature. The spin-glass systems, ferromagnetic materials with high anisotropy, and materials with competing magnetic interactions all can lead to thermomagnetic irreversibility.[28] Figure 2(b) shows the temperature dependence of inverse susceptibility (1/χ vs. T) and the Curie–Weiss fitting of the 1/χ (T). The values of effective magnetic moment ( 6.89 for EuTiO3 for Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3, and for Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 can be obtain based on the , which belongs to a reasonable region (.[29]

Fig. 2. (color online) (a) Temperature dependence of ZFC and FC magnetizations of the EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) under a magnetic field of 0.1 kOe; (b) the temperature dependence of inverse susceptibility fitting to the Curie–Weiss law.

Figure 3 shows the isothermal magnetization curves at temperatures between T = 2 K and T = 28 K under the applied magnetic fields ranging from 0 to 50 kOe. For EuTiO3, the isothermal magnetization curve increases linearly at low magnetic field and tends to be saturate with increasing magnetic field below Nair temperature ( as shown in Fig. 3(a). In the low fields, the magnetization value at low temperature is smaller than at the higher temperature as shown in Fig. 4(a1). These are typical AFM natures. With the La3+ and Ce3+ ions instead of Eu2+ ions, the data of magnetization isotherms increase rapidly at low magnetic fields and tend to be saturate under strong magnetic fields below as shown in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c). The magnetization curves do not intersect in Figs. 4(a2)4(a3). These are typical FM natures, which suggest magnetic transition from AFM to FM for the substitution of Eu for Ce and La. Figure 3(d) shows the increase and decrease model of isothermal magnetization curve at 2 K, indicating no magnetic hysteresis. The magnetic moments of per Eu atom, respectively, are for EuTiO3, for Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3, and for Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 at 5 T: these values are smaller than the expected values for Eu2+ ion, which is likely to be attributed to the crystalline electric field.

Fig. 3. (color online) (a)–(c) Magnetization isotherms of the EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) collected in a temperature range of 2–28 K; (d) field dependence of magnetization data for increasing and decreasing field model at 2 K.
Fig. 4. (color online) (a) Magnetization isotherms of the EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) collected at 2, 3, 4, and 5 K under low field; (b) Arrott plot of the EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 K under low field.

Based on the Banerjee criterion,[30] when the slope of the Arrott plot is negative, the magnetic transition is expected to be of the first order; on the contrary, it will be of the second order. Figure 4(b) shows the curves of for . The negative slope of EuTiO3 implies the first order below . However, the Arrott plots of Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 suggest that the phase transition is of the second order for the positive slope.

The values of can be calculated by the magnetization isotherms data from the Maxwell relation .[31] Figure 5(a) shows the temperature dependence of the for EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) under magnetic fields. The values of increase with applied magnetic field increasing. The values of are 40.7 J/(kgK) for EuTiO3 33.8 and 34.4 J/(kgK) for Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) under magnetic field change 0–50 kOe, respectively. The decrease of is attributed to the decreasing of the Eu2+ with doping La (x = 0.1) and Ce (x = 0.1) respectively. In order to further confirm the magnetic transition after Eu has been substituted by La (x = 0.1) and Ce (x = 0.1), the values of are calculated under low magnetic field change as shown in Fig. 5(b). The negative values of for EuTiO3 compound suggest the AFM order below . However, when Eu is substituted by La (x = 0.1) and Ce (x = 0.1), the positive values of below transition temperature indicate the AFM–FM magnetic transition.

Fig. 5. (color online) (a) Temperature dependence of for the EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) under different magnetic fields; (b) under low magnetic field.

Figure 6 shows the values of for EuTiO3, Eu0.9La0.1TiO3, and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 changing with temperature under magnetic field changes of 10 kOe and 20 kOe. Under the magnetic field change of 10 kOe, the values of are 9.8 J/(kgK), 10.8 J/(kgK), and 11 J/(kgK) for EuTiO3, Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3, respectively. The values of increase below the transition temperature with doping La (x = 0.1) and Ce (x = 0.1), which may be caused by the magnetic transition AFM–FM. Another key parameter is .[31] Table 1 shows the RC values of EuTiO3, Eu0.9La0.1TiO3, and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3, which are calculated under 10 kOe and 20 kOe of the magnetic field. The values of RC are evaluated to be 51.8 J/kg and 114.6 J/kg for Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 and 39.3 J/kg and 103.4 J/kg for Eu0.9La0.1TiO3, respectively under 10 kOe and 20 kOe of the magnetic field. Compared with the RC value of EuTiO3 the RC is significantly increased with La (x = 0.1) and Ce (x = 0.1). The MCE and RC values of the Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) compounds are improved, which are an excellent candidate for cryogenic magnetic refrigeration. We hope that our study will further promote the research on magnetocaloric and relevant cooling devices.

Fig. 6. (color online) Temperature dependence of for EuTiO3 and Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce) under magnetic fields of (a) 10 kOe and (b) 20 kOe.
4. Conclusions

Giant reversible magnetocaloric effects and magnetic properties in Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 and Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 are investigated. When part of Eu2+ ions are substituted by La3+ and Ce3+ ions, there is a slight excess of oxygen in the Eu0.9R0.1TiO3 (R = La, Ce), which could compensate for the mismatch of chemical valence and increase the lattice constant. It leads to the magnetic ground state switched from AFM to FM. The large low-field enhancements of and RC are 10.8 J/(kgK) and 51.8 J/kg for Eu0.9La0.1TiO3 and 11 J/(kgK), and 39.3 J/kg for Eu0.9Ce0.1TiO3 for the case of magnetic field change of 10 kOe while pure EuTiO3 counterpart has J/(kgK) and RC = 27 J/kg. The increases of and RC can be attributed to magnetic phase transition. The giant reversible MCE and large RC suggest that the compounds could be promising materials in low temperature and low magnetic field refrigerants. Our study shows that the MCE and RC are improved, which will promote further research on magnetocaloric and relevant cooling devices.

Reference
[1] Pecharsky V K Gschneidner K A Tsokol A O 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 1479
[2] Guo Z B Du Y W Zhu J S Huang H Ding W P Feng D 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1142
[3] Tegus O Bruck E Buschow K H J Boer F R 2002 Nature 415 150
[4] Tegus O Bao L H Song L 2013 Chin. Phys. 22 037506
[5] Hu F X Shen B G Sun J R Zhang X 2000 Chin. Phys. 9 550
[6] Hu F X Shen B G Sun J R 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 3460
[7] Tishin A M Spichkin Y I 2003 Institute of Physics Publishing Bristol, Philadelphia 475
[8] Wada H Tomekawa S Shiga M 1999 Cryogenics 39 915
[9] Ćwik J Palewski T Nenkov K Lyubina J Warchulska J Klamut J Gutfleisch O 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater 18 2821
[10] Goremychkin E A Natkaniec I Mühle E 1989 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 81 63
[11] Ćwik J Palewski T Nenkov K Warchulska J Klamut J 2012 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 677
[12] Zhang X X Wang F W Wen G H 2001 J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 13 L747
[13] Gschneidner K A Jr. Pecharsky V K Tsokol A O 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 1479
[14] Balli M Jandl S Fournier P Mansouri S Mukhin A Ivanov Yu V Balbashov A M 2015 J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 374 252
[15] Murthy J K Chandrasekhar K D Mahana S Topwal D Venimadhav A 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 35501
[16] Balli M Jandl S Fournier P Gospodinov M M 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 232402
[17] Wei T Song Q G Zhou Q J Li Z P Qi X L Liu W P 2011 Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 599
[18] Kańtil J Javorsky P Andreev A V 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 2318
[19] Lee J H Fang L Vlahos E Ke X Jung Y W Kourkoutis L F 2010 Nature 466 954
[20] Rubi K Kumar P Repaka D V M Chen R Wang J S Mahendiran R 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 032407
[21] Mo Z J Hao Z H Deng J Z Shen J Li L Wu J F Feng X H Ji R S Shen B G 2017 J. Alloy. Compd. 694 235
[22] Mo Z J Sun Q L Wang C H Wu H Z Li L Meng F B Tang C C Zhao Y Shen J 2017 Ceram. Int. 43 2083
[23] Roy S Khan N Mandal P 2016 APL Mater. 4 1479
[24] Katsufuji T Takagi H 2001 Phys. Rev. 64 054415
[25] Yang H Wang H Y Yoon J 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 3794
[26] Zhang H Shen B G Xu Z Y Shen J Hu F X Sun J R 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 092401
[27] Scagnoli V Allieta M Walker H Scavini M Katsufuji T Sagarna L Zaharko O Mazzoli C 2012 Phys. Rev. 86 094432
[28] Akamatsu H Kumagai Y Fumiyasu Oba Fujita K Murakami H Tanaka K Tanaka I 2011 Phys. Rev. 83 094432
[29] McGuire T R Shafer M W Joenk R J Alperin H A Pickart S J 1966 J. Appl. Phys. 37 981
[30] Banerjee S K 1964 Phys. Lett. 12 16
[31] Gschneidner K A Pecharsky V K Pecharsky A O Zimm C B 1999 Mater. Sci. Forum. 315 69